Lessons - The CrowdStrike Co-Founder on How America Beats China Before It's Too Late | Dmitri Alperovitch - Author of World on the Brink
➡️ Like The Podcast? Leave A Rating: https://ratethispodcast.com/successstory
In this "Lessons" episode, Dmitri Alperovitch, author of *World on the Brink* and co-founder of CrowdStrike, explains why China’s rise may not be as inevitable as many believe. He explores how economic stagnation, demographic decline, and policy decisions could limit China’s long-term power, while outlining why preventing a conflict over Taiwan should remain a critical priority for the United States. Dmitri also discusses America’s advantages in innovation, access to capital, military strength, and global alliances, and how leveraging these strengths could help preserve its position in the race for the 21st century.
➡️ Show Links
https://successstorypodcast.com
YouTube: https://youtu.be/p1O9UKhi650
Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/dmitri-alperovitch-co-founder-of-crowdstrike-what/id1484783544
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/1gi59tvN0cRUV0uTfLcptD
➡️ Watch the Podcast on YouTube
WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.171 --> 00:00:17.228
In this lessons episode, discover why China's rise may be less inevitable than it appears, understand how economic stagnation, demographic decline, and policy choices could limit its power, explore why avoiding conflict over Taiwan is critical, and uncover how America's innovation, alliances, and military strength can preserve its global advantage.
2
00:00:24.577 --> 00:00:29.778
So it's obviously, when you start to pay attention to it, you start to realize how big an issue it is.
3
00:00:29.798 --> 00:00:34.960
And you sort of had a front row seat because you were dealing with companies that were on the receiving end of some of these attacks.
4
00:00:35.000 --> 00:00:40.241
So I've listened to a few of your thoughts on this.
5
00:00:41.021 --> 00:00:46.563
Ray Dalio believes that China will have an inevitable rise, and you disagree with that.
6
00:00:46.803 --> 00:00:47.803
And I'm curious about...
7
00:00:50.210 --> 00:00:57.096
If you disagree with Ray Dalio's view on China's inevitable rise, what do you believe can happen?
8
00:00:57.116 --> 00:01:02.860
A best-case scenario, what does us winning this Cold War look like?
9
00:01:03.821 --> 00:01:13.929
And what is the perfect set of geopolitical conditions that you hope to accomplish with awareness, with advocacy, with think tank, with policy influence, with...
10
00:01:15.256 --> 00:01:17.558
I guess I don't want it to just be doom and gloom.
11
00:01:17.698 --> 00:01:24.342
I want to have some sort of roadmap for where we can go, given that this is a real threat.
12
00:01:24.942 --> 00:01:43.915
Yeah, and my book, World on the Brink, How America Can Beat China in the Race of the 21st Century, is actually very optimistic, believe it or not, despite the title, because the first half of the book talks about the problem, the reason why Taiwan matters, the reason why we're on a path to conflict, but the second part of the book actually talks about solutions, and it argues that we have every strength
13
00:01:44.755 --> 00:01:45.376
over China.
14
00:01:45.616 --> 00:01:48.138
China is much weaker than we think that they are.
15
00:01:48.218 --> 00:01:49.058
We are much stronger.
16
00:01:49.879 --> 00:01:54.462
China, I think, is actually a weaker power than the Soviet Union ever was during the First Cold War.
17
00:01:54.702 --> 00:01:57.104
If we won that one, we can absolutely win this one.
18
00:01:57.645 --> 00:01:59.346
We have all the ingredients for victory.
19
00:01:59.406 --> 00:02:01.347
The only question is, are we willing to use them?
20
00:02:01.667 --> 00:02:03.169
Do we have the political will to do so?
21
00:02:04.105 --> 00:02:08.286
And look, the strategy for victory begins with keeping the Cold War cold, right?
22
00:02:08.646 --> 00:02:11.187
We managed to do that for the first Cold War.
23
00:02:11.967 --> 00:02:21.309
It was not easy, and there were these very tense moments, of course, particularly in the 1960s, where the conflict risked escalation.
24
00:02:22.590 --> 00:02:26.711
But if we managed to do that with China, if we managed to keep them from invading Taiwan,
25
00:02:28.642 --> 00:02:31.904
Their long-term trajectory is not great at all.
26
00:02:32.104 --> 00:02:33.885
I completely disagree with Ray Dalio.
27
00:02:34.265 --> 00:02:41.610
In fact, this was the common wisdom, you know, 10, even five years ago that China's rise and is inevitable, America's in decline.
28
00:02:41.750 --> 00:02:42.631
I never believed that.
29
00:02:43.751 --> 00:02:48.294
Nowadays, more people, I think, are moving over to my side of the equation rather than his.
30
00:02:48.954 --> 00:02:52.637
Because if you look at just economics and demographics,
31
00:02:53.637 --> 00:02:55.338
China is really screwed, right?
32
00:02:55.418 --> 00:03:01.462
So let's begin with their economy, which is now stagnating on a relative basis.
33
00:03:01.582 --> 00:03:03.763
The era of double-digit growth is gone.
34
00:03:03.783 --> 00:03:11.768
For the longest time, as they went on this historic growth path for 40 years,
35
00:03:12.871 --> 00:03:17.234
that double digit growth, people were asking the question, would it ever end one day?
36
00:03:17.834 --> 00:03:20.896
Well, we got the answer is yes, it would.
37
00:03:21.156 --> 00:03:27.120
And the cause of that was middle income trap, which most countries hit, right?
38
00:03:27.140 --> 00:03:34.185
You had Japan experience, Korea, Taiwan, all these countries that experienced rapid growth initially.
39
00:03:35.165 --> 00:03:37.607
Eventually, you hit about $10,000 per capita.
40
00:03:39.648 --> 00:03:51.378
and labor costs rise, productivity declines, and growth stagnates or becomes much, much lower on par with all the developed countries.
41
00:03:52.159 --> 00:03:54.701
China right now is at $13,000 per capita.
42
00:03:55.301 --> 00:04:00.366
And the problem for China is that they hit this middle income trap too early, right?
43
00:04:00.406 --> 00:04:03.929
When Japan did it, when Korea did it, they were already developed countries.
44
00:04:04.109 --> 00:04:06.150
Most of the population was the middle class.
45
00:04:06.911 --> 00:04:08.253
And that's not the case in China.
46
00:04:08.393 --> 00:04:11.337
You still have a huge amount of poverty in China.
47
00:04:11.357 --> 00:04:15.402
You still have huge rural populations that have not participated in this boom.
48
00:04:16.964 --> 00:04:17.865
And that is...
49
00:04:21.060 --> 00:04:30.088
Really, the challenge now for them, how to manage their slowing growth when you've got enormous economic challenges that still remain in the country.
50
00:04:30.849 --> 00:04:40.078
And on top of that, you've got incredible mismanagement of the economy that's been taking place under Xi Jinping, because this is a guy that doesn't really understand economics.
51
00:04:40.178 --> 00:04:41.980
He's a traditional Marxist-Leninist.
52
00:04:42.500 --> 00:04:48.205
very ideological and has driven away most of the bureaucrats that they've had for decades in power.
53
00:04:48.785 --> 00:05:02.437
They've now left the Politburo, have been kicked out, and he's replaced them with security man, with hardcore power people, because he's obsessed, of course, with population control, with security.
54
00:05:02.977 --> 00:05:04.138
to the exclusion of economy.
55
00:05:04.158 --> 00:05:13.728
He's driven a lot of businesses away by cracking down on both the domestic tech sector, Jack Ma, for example, as well as foreign companies.
56
00:05:14.328 --> 00:05:16.791
Many law firms, Western law firms, have left the country.
57
00:05:16.831 --> 00:05:22.657
And of course, if you're a Western business, you can't operate in a place if you don't have access to lawyers you can trust.
58
00:05:24.158 --> 00:05:34.145
So he's created a very unattractive environment there, which is why foreign direct investment in China has dropped 20% year over year and is likely to keep continuing going down over time.
59
00:05:34.745 --> 00:05:37.947
And you have a huge real estate bubble.
60
00:05:39.088 --> 00:05:48.655
Just to give you a sense of what it's like right now, at the height of 2008, at the time when we had our real estate bubble, real estate was about 10% of our GDP.
61
00:05:49.175 --> 00:05:50.576
Today in China, it is 30%.
62
00:05:52.157 --> 00:05:53.718
just unimaginable size.
63
00:05:53.898 --> 00:05:55.159
Now, it's a little different.
64
00:05:55.239 --> 00:05:56.841
They're not as leveraged as they are.
65
00:05:57.221 --> 00:06:05.867
The rest of their financial system is not as significant as it was for us in 2008 because guess how they're financing much of that real estate boom?
66
00:06:06.768 --> 00:06:18.777
They're financing it through the middle class because the way that development works in China, if you're a developer, you're getting huge deposits from people that want to buy apartments, and you're using those deposits to actually finance the construction on much of it.
67
00:06:19.257 --> 00:06:28.179
So as they're building all these ghost cities, as they have had this over capacity in real estate, it is not the banks mostly that are in trouble.
68
00:06:28.479 --> 00:06:34.461
It is the life savings of the middle class because in the middle class in China, where do you put your money that you've saved?
69
00:06:34.581 --> 00:06:37.301
You're not gonna put it in a bank, an estate-owned bank, you don't trust it.
70
00:06:37.321 --> 00:06:41.522
You're not gonna put it in a mattress because you know that it can be seized by the government.
71
00:06:41.822 --> 00:06:44.303
You're not gonna put it in the stock market because you believe it's rigged.
72
00:06:44.323 --> 00:06:48.004
In fact, it's remarkable that you've had this incredible growth in China the last 20 years
73
00:06:48.584 --> 00:06:51.266
The stock market has basically stayed flat.
74
00:06:51.626 --> 00:06:54.849
So that tells you that there's no new investment in equities in China.
75
00:06:55.389 --> 00:06:57.271
It's all gone into real estate for the most part.
76
00:06:57.991 --> 00:06:59.933
And those people are going to be wiped out.
77
00:07:00.433 --> 00:07:11.322
Now, Xi Jinping doesn't care about that because he's got such an incredible surveillance state and control of his population, but it's not great for your economic productivity to have the middle class lose all their life savings.
78
00:07:12.342 --> 00:07:23.067
And on top of all of those challenges, which are enough to give anyone a headache and seem daunting, you have the population collapse that has already started to take place, right?
79
00:07:23.107 --> 00:07:25.928
They are already starting to lose people every single year.
80
00:07:27.029 --> 00:07:29.030
The deaths exceed the birth rates.
81
00:07:29.810 --> 00:07:34.277
And it's escalating and is going to continue to escalate throughout the century.
82
00:07:34.658 --> 00:07:43.551
So they're going to go from about 1.4 billion people that they have today to, conservatively speaking, around 550 million by the end of the century.
83
00:07:44.552 --> 00:07:59.118
an incredible decline in population, which by the way is highly deflationary, highly likely to cause further stagnation, and is an economic headwind that I don't know how you escape.
84
00:07:59.518 --> 00:08:03.120
For all those reasons, I think over the long term, the
85
00:08:03.940 --> 00:08:06.762
Their economic prospects are not great.
86
00:08:06.782 --> 00:08:08.984
Their growth rate is about the same as ours today.
87
00:08:09.204 --> 00:08:11.346
And of course, the economy is 25% smaller.
88
00:08:12.166 --> 00:08:19.912
And at that growth rate, unless something dramatic changes here or in China, they're never going to eclipse us economically.
89
00:08:19.932 --> 00:08:23.675
So this idea that they're rising power with declining power, I just fundamentally disagree with.
90
00:08:24.355 --> 00:08:26.637
And we've got every strength, right?
91
00:08:26.797 --> 00:08:28.958
We've got an incredible innovation economy.
92
00:08:28.998 --> 00:08:31.360
Where is most of the AI innovation taking place?
93
00:08:31.800 --> 00:08:33.781
It is here in America, right?
94
00:08:33.902 --> 00:08:44.789
Where do you have incredible access to capital where companies like CrowdStrike is able to raise enormous money in the private markets and then later in the public markets?
95
00:08:44.909 --> 00:08:45.730
It's here in America.
96
00:08:46.670 --> 00:08:53.375
Where you have incredible single market, the largest in the world where selling a product
97
00:08:53.955 --> 00:08:57.779
in Alabama is exactly the same as it is selling in Seattle.
98
00:08:58.660 --> 00:09:00.202
That's not true anywhere else in the world.
99
00:09:00.222 --> 00:09:10.113
You go to Europe and it's a collection of, you know, almost 3,000 countries and with different languages, different cultures, different go-to-market strategies.
100
00:09:10.914 --> 00:09:12.736
It's a huge challenge to operate there, right?
101
00:09:12.816 --> 00:09:13.777
Unlike here in America.
102
00:09:14.217 --> 00:09:15.658
You have the greatest military in the world.
103
00:09:15.678 --> 00:09:18.560
You have the greatest alliance network, the world's biggest economy.
104
00:09:18.981 --> 00:09:20.462
We have enormous advantages.
105
00:09:20.842 --> 00:09:26.606
Probably our biggest disadvantage is our political system and the dysfunction that we have here in Washington, D.C.
106
00:09:27.087 --> 00:09:32.771
But aside from that, the strengths are enormous, and China has these huge, huge problems.
107
00:09:32.811 --> 00:09:36.053
So I argue that if we manage to avoid a war—
108
00:09:36.834 --> 00:10:00.088
which should be the defining priority for the United States foreign policy, if we manage to preserve Taiwan's de facto sovereignty and keep China contained in that region, we can wait them out, that they're going to experience more and more stagnation, their economic situation is going to cause them more and more problems, which is going to impact their ability to spend money on the military,
109
00:10:01.268 --> 00:10:03.590
and threaten war and so forth.
110
00:10:03.690 --> 00:10:12.255
And their influence already, economic influence in the world, is declining because the economy is not growing, so it's less attractive to invest in it.
111
00:10:12.416 --> 00:10:17.579
And they don't have extra cash to invest in projects like the Belt and Road Initiative.
112
00:10:17.659 --> 00:10:23.663
They wanted to spend about $8 trillion over a decade, decade and a half on Belt and Road.
113
00:10:23.683 --> 00:10:25.124
They spent less than $2 trillion.
114
00:10:25.704 --> 00:10:31.428
And it's basically stagnating as well because they're out of cash.
115
00:10:31.588 --> 00:10:34.509
So for all those reasons, I disagree with Ray Dalio.
116
00:10:34.870 --> 00:10:35.770
Thanks for tuning in.
117
00:10:35.850 --> 00:10:40.253
If you found this valuable, don't forget to hit that subscribe button so you never miss an episode.
118
00:10:40.333 --> 00:10:45.856
And if you want to dive deeper into this conversation, check out the links in the description to watch the full episode.
119
00:10:45.996 --> 00:10:46.957
See you in the next one.